Data at Your Fingertips

The Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness (IRE) presents institutional data in accessible and meaningful ways and provides prompt, accurate responses to all requests for information. We are committed to maintaining high standards of data integrity and security at all times.

 

Tiger Tidbits

Our most requested data is packaged by category for easy viewing.

Latest Tiger Tidbits →

Integrated Postsecondary Data System (IPEDS)

IPEDS is a system of surveys conducted annually by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). These data are gathered to provide a comprehensive picture of postsecondary education in the United States.

IPEDS Surveys →

Common Data Sets

The Common Data Set (CDS) initiative is a collaborative effort among data providers in the higher education community and publishers as represented by the College Board, Peterson’s, and U.S. News & World Report. CDS reports display standardized Trinity statistics for year over year comparisons.

View the Common Data Sets →

Tableau Dashboards (login required)

Our database and dashboarding system provides common data sets and reports.

Browse the Dashboards →

So what do we do?

  • Ensure compliance with all accreditation requirements
  • Facilitate recurring assessment processes
  • Collect and distribute qualitative and quantitative data 
  • Provide data collection tools and consultation services
  • Analyze institutional data obtained from myriad sources
  • Oversee data governance and standardization efforts
  • Communicate relevant data to various audiences

Quick Facts

 
Enrollment Snapshot

 

First-Year Snapshot

Total: 601
Percentage Male: 46%
Percentage Underrepresented: 51%
Average SAT Score: 1417
Average ACT Score: 32.2
Percentage Federal Pell Grant Recipients: 15%

This information can also be found in our Common Data Sets

 
Major and Minor Snapshot

 

 

External Data Sources

 

Assessment

Assessment Resources

We created an entire (secure) website to house our multitude of department- or topic-specific resources.

Assessment Resources →

TU Survey Calendar

We maintain an updated calendar of active and upcoming surveys.  To add your survey to the calendar, please contact Michelle Byrne

Survey Calendar →

Survey Policy (coming soon)

 


Student Achievement and Success

Undergraduate Student Success

 
Retention Rate

Trinity's Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness has identified acceptable, preferred, and ideal retention rates. Using data from reference institutions, retention rates are regressed on institutional characteristics. The resulting model is used to predict retention rates at Trinity based on the characteristics of each incoming cohort and characteristics of Trinity in the year each cohort started. The resulting prediction is Trinity's preferred retention rate. The ideal and acceptable retention rates are the upper and lower limits of the 95% prediction interval around each predicted retention rate. 

For the last five years, Trinity’s retention rate from first to second year has exceeded the preferred retention rate by 3-6 percentage points, ranging from 91% to 93% with an average of 92%. Among first-time bachelor’s degree-seeking students who started at Trinity in 2024, 92% were retained to the second year (see Figure 1).

 

Line chart titled “Retention Rate Targets and Actuals 2021–2025” comparing Trinity retention rates to ideal, preferred, and acceptable benchmarks. Trinity retention remains consistently high between about 92% and 94%, closely tracking the ideal benchmark and exceeding preferred and acceptable levels each year.

Figure 1: First to Second Year Retention Rate Targets and Actuals for First-Time Bachelor’s Degree-Seeking Undergraduates by Cohort Year

 

Graduation Rate

Trinity's Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness has also identified acceptable, preferred, and ideal 6-year graduation rates. Using data from reference institutions, 6-year graduation rates are regressed on institutional characteristics. The resulting model is used to predict 6-year graduation rates at Trinity based on characteristics of each incoming cohort and characteristics of Trinity in the years each cohort was enrolled. The resulting prediction is Trinity's preferred 6-year graduation rate. The ideal and acceptable 6-year graduation rates are the upper and lower limits of the 95% prediction interval around each predicted 6-year graduation rate.

For the last five years, Trinity’s 6-year graduation rate has generally exceeded the acceptable rate by 5-10 percentage points, ranging from 76% to 84% with an average of 81%. Using the most recently available cohort (2019), Trinity’s current 6-year graduation rate is 82% (see Figure 2).
 

Line chart titled “Graduation Rate Targets and Actuals 2021–2025” showing Trinity graduation rates compared to ideal, preferred, and acceptable benchmarks. Trinity ranges from about 76% to 84%, meeting or exceeding preferred benchmarks in most years but remaining below the ideal target of about 88–90%.

Figure 2: Bachelor’s Degree Graduation Rate Targets and Actuals for Full-Time, First-Time, Bachelor’s Degree-Seeking Undergraduates within 6 Years by Cohort Year

 
Career Outcomes

Trinity University participates annually in the National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE) First-Destination Survey, which tracks the activities of college graduates within six months of graduation.

The First-Destination Survey provides an Outcome rate, which represents the number of graduates who are employed, in volunteer or military service, or enrolled in further education divided by the number of graduates who are employed, in volunteer or military service, or enrolled in further education and those who are seeking employment or seeking continuing education. In addition, the First-Destination Survey provides a Knowledge rate, which represents the percentage of graduates for whom an outcome is known.

Trinity has identified acceptable and preferred Outcome and Knowledge rates based on comparisons with other institutions. The preferred values represent the rates at institutions classified as “Baccalaureate Arts & Sciences” by the Carnegie Classification of Higher Education. The acceptable values represent the rates of all graduates who earned bachelor’s degrees regardless of institution type.

Since 2020, Trinity’s Outcome rate has been higher than the acceptable rate, and for the last 4 years, Trinity’s rate has been above the preferred rate of 92%. For students who graduated in 2024, Trinity’s Outcome rate is 98% (see Figure 3).

 

Line chart titled “Outcome Rate 2020–2024” comparing Trinity outcomes to benchmark levels. Trinity outcomes rise from about 87% in 2020 to about 98% in 2024, consistently exceeding the preferred benchmark of about 90–92% and the acceptable benchmark of about 82–86%.

Figure 3: Career Outcome Rate Targets and Actuals by Graduation Year

Trinity’s Knowledge rate has been above the acceptable and the preferred rates for the last 5 years. For students who graduated in 2024, Trinity’s Knowledge Rate is 86% (see Figure 4).

Line chart titled “Knowledge Rate 2020–2024” showing Trinity student knowledge outcomes compared with preferred and acceptable benchmarks. Trinity increases from about 81% in 2020 to about 86% in 2024, remaining above the preferred benchmark of about 75–79% and well above the acceptable benchmark of about 54–57%.

Figure 4: Knowledge Rate Targets and Actuals by Graduation Year


Graduate Student Success

Trinity University offers six masters-level graduate programs, one in Accounting, two in Health Care Administration, and three in Education. All of Trinity's graduate programs identify and evaluate goals and outcomes for multiple measures of student achievement, including time to degree, completion rates, and job placement or certification exam pass rates. 

Time to Degree

Each graduate program has a target time to degree based on credit hours and degree requirements. Table 1 shows the target time to degree for each graduate program. 

Table 1 - Time-To-Degree Targets and Actuals by Program

Program

Target Time 
to Degree

Accounting (M.S.)

 2 terms

Health Care Administration (M.S.) 

28 months

Health Care Administration - Executive (M.S.)

23 months 

School Leadership (M.Ed.)

4 terms

School Psychology (M.A.)

7 terms

Teaching (M.A.)

3 terms

 

Table 2 shows the number of graduates over the last three years and the percentage of graduates in each year that graduated in the target timeframe. For each of the last three years, all programs except the Health Care Administration (Executive) program had 100% of graduates complete their degrees in the target timeframe. The cohort of Health Care Administration (Executive) students who graduated in 2023 started their program in 2020. This cohort was particularly impacted by the pandemic because all students enrolled in the Executive program are full-time employees in the healthcare industry.

Table 2 – Number of Graduates and Percentage of Graduates who Completed in Preferred Time by Graduation Year

 

2023

2024

2025

# of Graduates

% in Preferred Time

# of Graduates

% in Preferred Time

# of Graduates

% in Preferred Time

Accounting (M.S.)

26

100%

24

100%

26

100%

Health Care Administration (M.S.)

25

100%

21

100%

26

100%

Health Care Administration - Executive (M.S.)

9

78%

6

100%

3

100%

School Leadership (M.Ed.) 

15

100%

10

100%

14

100%

School Psychology (M.A.)

10

100%

11

100%

12

100%

Teaching (M.A.)

14

100%

15

100%

18

100%

 

Completion Rate

Each graduate program has a target completion rate of 95%, except for the Master of Arts in Teaching, which has a target of 80%. This lower target reflects the program’s emphasis on vocational fit – when students are counseled into other roles in education or into related fields such as non-profits, counseling, or social work, that is considered a successful outcome. 

The most recent cohorts of the Accounting, Health Care Administration, School Leadership, and Teaching programs all met their target completion rates. The Health Care Administration (Executive) program and the School Psychology program did not meet their targets (see Table 3). However, because the programs are small, only one student in the Health Care Administration (Executive) program did not complete, and only two students in the School Psychology program did not complete.

Table 3 – Completion Rates by Program and Cohort Year

 

2023

20242025

# in Cohort

Completion Rate

# in Cohort

Completion Rate

# in Cohort

Completion Rate

Accounting (M.S.)

26

100%

24

100%

26

100%

Health Care Administration (M.S.)

25

100%

22

95%

26

100%

Health Care Administration - Executive (M.S.)

10

90%

6

100%

4

75%

School Leadership (M.Ed.) 

17

88%

10

100%

14

100%

School Psychology (M.A.)

10

100%

11

100%

14

86%

Teaching (M.A.)

16

88%

15

100%

18

100%

      

Job Placement/Certification Exam Pass Rates

Each graduate program has a target job placement or certification exam pass rate. The School Psychology program and both Health Care Administration programs have a target job placement rate of 100% within 6 months of graduation and the Accounting program has a target job placement rate of 90% at graduation. For all four programs, the last three cohorts to graduate had 100% job placement rates (see Table 4).

Table 4 – Job Placement Rates by Program and Graduation Year

 

2023

2024

2025

Accounting (M.S.)

100%

100%

100%

Health Care Administration (M.S.)

100%

100%

100%

Health Care Administration - Executive (M.S.)

100%

100%

100%

School Psychology (M.A.)

100%

100%

100%

 

The School Leadership program has a target certification exam pass rate of 95% and the Teaching program has a target pass rate of 100%. In the most recent cohort of graduates, the Teaching program had a certification exam pass rate of 94% on the Pedagogy and Professional Responsibilities (PPR) exam and a 100% pass rate on the content exams, whereas the School Leadership program had a 57% pass rate for the Principal as Instructional Leader (PAIL) exam and an 85% pass rate for the Performance Assessment for School Leaders (PASL) exam (see Table 5).

Table 5 – Certification Exam Pass Rates by Program and Graduation Year

 

Test

2023

2024

2025
School Leadership (M.Ed.)PAIL Exam

90%

90%

57%

PASL Exam

93%

100%

85%

Teaching (M.A.)PPR Exam

100%

100%

94%

Content Exams

100%

100%

100%

 

This year’s School Leadership outcomes are unusually low. They were impacted by a number of factors that led to deviating from the program’s expected timeline and process for exam preparation (these included a student death in the cohort and limited test availability at state testing centers). 

In response to these outcomes, the program will offer an intensive test prep session for the PAIL in the initial summer term to all students as part of program preparation, as well as to the six students who did not pass the exam on their first attempt (at no additional cost) to help them prepare for their next attempt.


Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges Accredited Institution Logo

Accreditation

Trinity University is accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC) to award baccalaureate and master’s degrees. Trinity University also may offer credentials such as certificates and diplomas at approved degree levels. Questions about the accreditation of Trinity University may be directed in writing to the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges at 1866 Southern Lane, Decatur, GA 30033-4097, by calling (404) 679-4500, or by using information available on SACSCOC’s website (www.sacscoc.org).

Additional Accreditations 

Trinity is also a member of the Associated Colleges of the South, a consortium of sixteen distinguished liberal arts colleges and universities.

Associated Colleges of the South logo

Reference Institutions


Contact Us


Northrup Hall, Suite 410
 @email

Michelle Byrne
Director of Institutional Effectiveness & Assessment
Frances Frey
Executive Director Institutional Research & Effectiveness
Emily Marshall
Assistant Director of Institutional Research
Nick Shults
Senior Institutional Research Systems Analyst